A Capstone Project: A way to Integrate Knowledge and Empower Students to Become Change Agents in the Practice Setting.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nursing education today calls for creative and innovative ways in preparing students for the future. The growing complexity in the practice setting demands that nursing students gain exposure to skill sets that empower them to be change agents. A capstone project in the final year of an Undergraduate Nursing Program enabled students to integrate their knowledge from all areas of their curriculum to address quality improvement (QI) issues. While the students’ projects were not QI projects, they functioned as precursors or ideas for future QI initiatives. The capstone projects were graded using a designed marking rubric that addressed the Undergraduate Degree Level Expectations and the entry to practice competencies for the Registered Nurse in Ontario. The students presented their work at a capstone conference that invited personnel from both academia and clinical practice organizations. The capstone project became a way to acknowledge ideas and accomplishments of future nursing graduates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it