MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Susceptibility of ascites tumor cells to ex-vivo killing by the oncolytic virus JX-963 in epithelial ovarian cancer

2009· article· en· W2342067795 on OpenAlexaff
Claire L. Davies, Kenneth Garson, F. LeBoeuf, John C. Bell, Johanne I. Weberpals

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOncolytic virusMedicineAscitesOvarian cancerFlow cytometryEx vivoMultiplicity of infectionCancerViability assayCancer researchPathologyVirusIn vivoCellVirologyImmunologyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e16537 Background: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has a poor prognosis, and novel therapies are urgently needed. One-third of patients with EOC will develop clinical ascites, an adverse prognostic factor. The ascitic fluid is rich in tumor cells which can be purified and used as a valuable source of patient material for in vitro analysis. In this study, we describe a method to evaluate the efficacy of ascitic tumor cell killing by the oncolytic virus, JX-963 (vaccinia strain) currently approved for use in a NCIC-CTG phase I trial. Methods: Research ethics approval and patient consent was obtained for this study. 15 samples were collected prospectively with relevant clinicopathologic information. Infection with JX-963 was performed using viral doses ranging from a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.5 to 8. Following a seven-day infection period, viability was assessed using the Alamar Blue metabolic assay and tracked by virally encoded green fluorescent protein (eGFP) expression, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and flow cytometry. Results: A standardized protocol was developed for the collection and purification of EOC cells from patient ascites for subsequent infection and quantification of viral killing. Qualitative analysis using phase contrast imaging of the total cell content showed greater opaque dead cell aggregates with increasing MOI over time. Although variable between individual samples, there was a strong correlation between escalating MOI and enhanced cell death in all patient ascites samples, when quantified by Alamar Blue assay and confirmed by flow cytometry and IHC. Similar cell killing profiles by JX-963 were observed for ascites tumor cells derived from both chemotherapy-naïve patients and chemotherapy-exposed (>1 prior line of chemotherapy) patients. Conclusions: EOC cells from patient ascites show effective but differential susceptibility to viral oncolysis by the JX-963 virus that appears to be independent of prior exposure to chemotherapy. The relevance of this work is that in an individual patient, this assay will allow the testing of panels of oncolytic viruses to identify candidate viral therapeutics which may predict response to treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.385 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicVirus-based gene therapy research→French-language works237,207→