Design and Testing of Radiofrequency Spherical four Coils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we present the design and testing of a radiofrequency prototype coil with good performances in terms of B1 magnetic field homogeneity and can be utilized for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. It is constituted of four coaxial separately tuned rings of wire and symmetrically located on a spherical surface. Compared to standard Helmholtz pair, which has 2nd-order magnetic field homogeneity, it yields to improvement in field homogeneity, while preserving the simplicity of design. The four coils of proposed structure are tuned to the same frequency. The proposed structure gets at 4th-order magnetic field homogeneity by optimizing the distance between rings and the diameters of outer loops. An electrical modeling of the four-coil system taking into account the coupling effects between all rings permits to determine the resonance frequency in the homogenous mode. Measurements of B1 field homogeneity were introduced in free space. Compared to the Helmholtz coil, the proposed structure presents good performances in terms of B1 homogeneity, quality factor and sensitivity. The design of proposed coil has been optimized for best SNR performances. Globally, this work claims to be a contribution to the study of the four-coil RF systems derived from the Helmholtz pairs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".