Bibliographic record
Abstract
Temporary exhibition, June 26–Sept. 21, 2008. 10,200 sq. ft. K. Michael Hays, adjunct curator of architecture at the Whitney Museum and professor of architectural theory at Harvard University; Dana Miller, associate curator. Traveling exhibition, Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago, Ill., March 14-June 21, 2009. http://www.mcachicago.org/exhibitions/. A quarter century after his death, Buckminster Fuller (1895–1983) has finally received serious treatment in a remarkably rich exhibit. Drawing primarily from the forty-fiveton R. Buckminster Fuller Archive at Stanford University, the exhibit covers Fuller's entire life—greatly assisted by Fuller, who obsessively saved correspondence, notes, and sketches, beginning in 1907. The exhibit includes approximately 220 models, videos, photographs, and works on paper. The exhibit's catalog, edited by K. Michael Hays and Dana Miller, is beautifully designed and offers not only a checklist of the items displayed and handsome reproductions of many of them but also a timeline of Fuller's life and pertinent events beyond it; a lengthy bibliography of books, articles, and other writings by and about him; and several excellent essays, including a reprint of Calvin Tomkins' influential 1966 New Yorker profile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.464 | 0.106 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".