MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2342608382 · doi:10.1111/hojo.1_12168

Prisoner Reentry at Work: Adding Business to the Mix M.Delgado. London: Lynne Rienner (2012) 241pp. £47.50hb ISBN 978-1-58826-818-1

2016· article· en· W2342608382 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gareth, Ruth Ruth, Amy .

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Howard Journal of Crime and Justice · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCrime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnthusiasmAppealPrisonAudience measurementSociologyGovernment (linguistics)Public relationsPolitical scienceCriminologyLawPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book describes the difficulties faced by people re-entering the community after a period of custody. Melvin Delgado provides a detailed and accessible view of the nature of the challenges of re-entry, the disproportionate impact of these challenges on people of colour, and the structural systems that maintain and exacerbate the social exclusion of individuals long after they have served their sentence. Delgado draws on studies from a variety of jurisdictions, including Norway, Canada, Australia and the UK. He acknowledges and explains the antithetical nature of the legislation and practices that regulate prison leavers, but also highlights examples of profit-oriented businesses that are, nonetheless, operating in a way that is socially conscientious. The book gives examples of how business can be an important part of the support networks for a socially marginalised group of people, and it unashamedly seeks to cultivate enthusiasm for these efforts within its readers. Delgado's work combines an academic literature review and commentary, with practical guidance for practitioners of social enterprise. Its cross-purpose delivery provides a dual lens that means the book will appeal to a broad readership. Delgado's approach of combining analysis of specific practices alongside broader academic overview is in contrast to what Delgado describes as the government's propensity to ‘compartmentalize social problems’ (p.12). He is consistent in his calls for increased understanding about the struggles of routes out of crime. He argues that effective solutions are unlikely without this understanding. To this end, Delgado examines the prospects for desistance-oriented prisoner release by drawing on ideas from a range of disciplines and varied perspectives, including county, State and federal levels. Within this broad lens of inquiry, the absence of a victim perspective seems surprising. Delgado advocates for a paradigmatic shift away from deficits, towards assets (p.177). It would have been especially interesting to see how the perspectives and experiences of victims within a socially collaborative and cohesive approach to reducing barriers to re-entry might have shaped this analysis. The absence of this perspective within the book implies that there is a presumed difference between the ‘victim’ and ‘offender’ perspective when this is not necessarily so. Delgado explores the ‘employment mind-set’ of prison leavers (p.56) as one of the deficits that can result from incarceration. He situates his examination of the ‘employment mind-set’ within the economically-deprived social contexts to which many people return after release from prison. This context can result in financial hardship for those who choose to ‘go straight’. Delgado recognises that addressing the economic barriers to re-entry will require a ‘major financial commitment on the part of government at all levels’ (p.89) and that this can be difficult because of public and political perceptions of ‘unworthiness’ about prisoners as recipients of public money. This multi-faceted coverage brings to the fore connections between problems of micro and macro scale as well as the necessity of action in both of these planes if improvement is to be achieved. By focusing on ‘a variety of extraordinary individual and environmental challenges’ (p.89), Delgado provides an insightful guide to individuals and organisations that offer expert support for people who are trying to reintegrate after release from prison and which operate within a socially responsible enterprise model. Alongside ‘classic’ social enterprise models, Delgado showcases the work of organisations like Homeboy/Homegirl Industries (explored from p.117): organisations that have been formed by the experiences and visions of some of the most challenging prison leavers, and that have been designed for profit, but driven by a socially-informed inclusive and transformative agenda. The book will be of interest to all researchers, practitioners, entrepreneurs and politicians as well as to people who are leaving prison and who want to help to shape society in ways that are inclusive, productive and maximise the good we can create when we work together.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.861

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Howard Journal of Crime and JusticeSame topicCrime, Illicit Activities, and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207