MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2342619481 · doi:10.2109/jcersj2.15227

Radioluminescence and thermally-stimulated luminescence of SiO<sub>2</sub> glasses prepared by spark plasma sintering

2016· article· en· W2342619481 on OpenAlexaff
Go Okada, Safa Kasap, Takayuki Yanagida

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Ceramic Society of Japan · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersMurata Science FoundationShizuoka UniversityMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsRadioluminescenceMaterials scienceLuminescenceSpark plasma sinteringDosimeterAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Atmospheric temperature rangeSinteringOptically stimulated luminescencePlasmaThermoluminescenceRadiationOptoelectronicsScintillatorOpticsComposite materialChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bulk SiO2 glasses have been prepared by spark plasma sintering and characterized towards dosimeter applications. The temperature dependence studies of radioluminescence suggest that there are two possible groups of luminescent centres, which show emissions at 385 and 511 nm. At room temperature, the former emission is predominant while the latter emission significantly increases at low temperatures, especially below 200 K. The origins of these emissions are attributed to a pair of silylene centres and dioxasilirane and silylene, respectively. After irradiating the sample, thermally-stimulated luminescence (TSL) is observed around 160°C and above 300°C, in which the emission is mainly the 385 nm component. The TSL intensity is linearly proportional to the radiation dose delivered, and a linear dynamic range has been demonstrated over 100–104 mGy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Ceramic Society of JapanSame topicLuminescence Properties of Advanced MaterialsFrench-language works237,207