Role of the School Nurse as perceived by school children Parent in Jeddah.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Descriptive research design was used to determine the school nurse role as perceived by the school children’ parents in Jeddah. A convenience sample was recruited for the study. The estimated number was 200 school children’parents living in Jeddah.The study was conducted at different public places in Jeddah. The study questionnaire included three parts. First, Socio-demographic data, second, a list of responsibilities of school nurse classified according to the school health program components and third, open-ended questions regarding the most important responsibility of the school nurse and the most important health education topic as perceived by the parents. The results of this study revealed that 82.5 % of the study subjects were mothers. The majority of schools don’t have the school nurse, and 6 % have a school nurse, and all the parents prefer hiring a school nurse for their children schools. Regarding the most important responsibility of the school nurse as perceived by the parents, screening was considered her first responsibility by nearly a quarter of parents, while 22 % of the parents agreed that prevention and control of communicable diseases was the first important health education topic. Recommendation: The Ministry of Education should recruit a nurse for each school with at least a higher nursing graduation and provide her with enough equipment and facilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".