MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2342896753 · doi:10.20502/rbg.v11i1.140

GEOMORFOLOGIA E SEDIMENTOLOGIA GLACIAL APLICADAS NA RECONSTRUÇÃO DA EVOLUÇÃO DO AMBIENTE DE DEGLACIAÇÃO DA GELEIRA WANDA, ILHA REI GEORGE, ANTÁRTICA

2010· article· pt· W2342896753 on OpenAlexaff
Kátia Kellem da Rosa, Rosemary Vieira, Francisco Ferrando Acuña, Jefferson Cárdia Simões

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Brasileira de Geomorfologia · 2010
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPolar Research and Ecology
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyGeologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo apresenta resultados das atividades de campo realizadas durante o OPERANTAR XXVI, no verão de 2007/2008, ao longo da área de deglaciação da geleira Wanda, ilha Rei George, Antártica. A geleira tem apresentado retração glacial nas últimas décadas, resultando num ambiente sedimentar, com a exposição de várias geoformas e depósitos. Esses registros geomorfológicos são úteis para a reconstrução da evolução deste ambiente de deglaciação. Os dados foram obtidos através da análise em laboratório dos sedimentos coletados em campo e posterior fotointerpretação de fotos aéreas (2003) na escala de 1:50.000, fornecidas pelo SHOA/SAF (Servicio Hidrográfico y Oceanográfico de la Armada de Chile/ Servicio Aéreo Fotogramétrico), juntamente com a análise de imagens de satélites SPOT de diferentes anos. Os resultados mostram distintas fases de deglaciação para a geleira Wanda com uma aceleração de sua retração e perda de espessura nas últimas décadas. Registros sedimentares também indicam que a geleira possui regime termal basal úmido.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Brasileira de GeomorfologiaSame topicPolar Research and EcologyFrench-language works237,207