MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2343142553 · doi:10.1353/rvs.2016.0019

Topografía y alegoresis en El primer loco , de Rosalía de Castro

2016· article· en· W2343142553 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fernando Cabo Aseguinolaza

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de estudios hispánicos · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGalician and Iberian cultural studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpretation (philosophy)Context (archaeology)PoetryIdeologyPaintingQuarter (Canadian coin)Perspective (graphical)HistoryLiteratureFeminismArtArt historyHumanitiesSociologyVisual artsPhilosophyLinguisticsArchaeologyPoliticsGender studiesLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article deals with the last of the novels written by Rosalía de Castro, El primer loco [The first inmate] (1881). From the perspective of a critical literary geography, it proposes an analysis of the referential logic that organizes this significant novel, which is very close in its conception and publication to En las orillas del Sar [On the banks of the river Sar], the last of the author’s great collections of poetry. The article specifically tackles the web of meanings underlying the choice of the key settings of the novel, Santiago de Compostela and the neighboring monastery of Conxo, both of which underwent processes of change related to deep ideological, social, but also spatial transformations that were current at the moment of the novel’s writing. These locations are conceived as products of discursive practices—produced places—allowing us to attend to them in terms of intertextual convergences and tensions among seemingly distant media like fiction, guidebooks, art history or painting and photography. Against this background, this article suggests a new interpretation of this often neglected work, which should be revised in the context of the Galician and Hispanic literature of the last quarter of the nineteenth century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score0.698

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de estudios hispánicosSame topicGalician and Iberian cultural studiesFrench-language works237,207