Endovascular Repair of a Chronic AV Fistula Presenting as Post-Partum High Output Heart Failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Acute injury to the large vessels is the most feared of diagnoses for a spinal surgeon, but far more common is the delayed presentation of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) formation. The mean time to diagnosis of an AV fistula in this scenario is just over 1 month. Treatment can include both open and endovascular repair. REPORT: This study presents a case of an otherwise healthy 39-year-old woman who initially presented with orthopnea, leg edema, and a presumptive diagnosis of post-partum cardiomyopathy. Cardiac investigations revealed high output cardiac failure and an abdominal CT scan confirmed an arterial venous fistula from the left common iliac artery to left common iliac vein. The patient maintained a cardiac output three times normal prior to her definitive treatment. This high flow physiology caused unique challenges for the endovascular procedure as the stent graft collapsed and distorted toward the iliac side wall. The AV fistula was eventually covered successfully and post-operative studies show no further fistula and normal cardiac function. This case demonstrates an unanticipated effect of very high flows of stent graft deployment. DISCUSSION: Extreme high flow AV fistulas can present as unexpected challenges to endovascular repair. These issues may be ameliorated by techniques such as controlled hypotension, adenosine, ventricular pacing, or proximal balloon occlusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".