Studies in the genus DODECATHEON of North-western America, with some reference to its use in floriculture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A study of the genus Dodecatheon has been made with two purposes in view: 1. A reclassification, of the genus in northwestern America, including Alaska, Yukon, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Montana. 2. An incidental survey of its horticultural possibilities. The method of approach has included collection of living material, hybridization, cytological study, and examination of seven to eight hundred herbarium specimens. Throughout the progress of this work, a number of horticulturally valuable characteristics have been observed and noted. Chromosome counts have been obtained for a number of species and from a number of localities. These counts indicate an interesting pattern of polyploidy within the genus: diploids on the east of the Cascade Mountains, polyploids extending north to Alaska along the Pacific Coast. Similarity of diploids and polyploids suggest autoploidy. As a result of the work outlined above, the genus has been reclassified into ten species and one variety on the basis of morphology, cytology, and distribution. Though a number of these species, two particularly, are variable, further subdivision is considered unwise until much more can be learned about the cytogenetics of the genus. Finally, the suggestion is made that cytogenetic study is the next step in horticultural improvement and might provide valuable evidence regarding the course of evolution in the genus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".