Simulation and modeling of hydro acoustic communication channels with wide band attenuation and ambient noise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acoustic waves are the preferred medium for long-range underwater communications. Increasing number of innovative methods for underwater communication using acoustic waves appears. Performance of underwater communications for the new methods needs to be evaluated through simulation. Simulation of underwater acoustic communications is challenging due to many impediments, including attenuation, multipath propagation, noise and Doppler spread. In this paper, a baseline time domain simulation model is extended to several frequency-domain models. The proposed frequency models, including two incoherent models and a coherent model, take multipath attenuation and ambient noise into account. An incoherent linear fitting model and a coherent model are simulated and compared with a theoretical reference and the baseline time model. The proposed incoherent models are also compared with one another. Simulation shows that the incoherent linear fitting model produces results similar to the multi-frequency-merge-path model, but requires less computation time. In addition, the proposed coherent model is compared with field experimental data. The coherent model with color noise, in the frequency domain, can match closely the bit error rates of the field experimental data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".