Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism, hypertension and risk of stroke: a prospective, nested case-control study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hyperhomocysteinemia is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. To date, limited prospective studies have examined the joint effects of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism, hyperhomocysteinemia and conventional vascular risk factors on risk of stroke and stroke death. METHODS: A total of 39 165 subjects from nine communities within Anqing, Anhui Province, China were prospectively followed from March 1995 to April 2005, with an average follow-up period of 6.2 years. None of the subjects had any history of vascular events at baseline. At follow-up, 251 incident stroke cases were identified. Using a nested, case-control study design, this analysis includes 106 cases with complete MTHFR C677T genotyping data and plasma samples. We selected 106 controls without vascular events matched for age, sex, community and years of plasma storage. Plasma total homocysteine (tHcy) level was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Hypertension was independently associated with incident stroke and stroke death after adjusting for important covariates including plasma log-transformed Hcy level. Relative to non-carriers of the MTHFR 677TT genotype with no hypertension, the adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of stroke and stroke death among hypertensive carriers of the MTHFR 677TT genotype was 10.6 (3.2 to 34.8), 5.8 (1.6 to 21.3), respectively. After excluding subjects with plasma Hcy above 20 μmol/L, the relative odds for stroke, but not for stroke death, was more significantly pronounced (OR = 24.1, 95% CI: 2.3 to 246.1) among subjects with moderate plasma Hcy levels. However, there was no significant interactive effect between hypertensive status and the MTHFR C677T variant on the odds of the two outcomes as estimated by interaction models. CONCLUSIONS: Our major findings suggest that joint effects of the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and hypertension are consistent in predicting a significantly high risk of stroke. In addition for moderate plasma levels of Hcy, the predicted effects on the risk for the primary end point of stroke were more pronounced. These results may help to modify current approaches to vascular disease prevention in Chinese hypertensive patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".