MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2343888274 · doi:10.12735/psi.v2n1p01

Micropropagation of Yeheb from Shoot Tip: An Endangered Multipurpose Shrub

2015· article· en· W2343888274 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chanie Derso, Tileye Feyissa

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Science International · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant tissue culture and regeneration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShootMicropropagationExplant cultureMurashige and Skoog mediumActivated charcoalHorticultureBotanyBiologyChemistryIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study focuses on in vitro propagation of an endangered species of C. edulis. In vitro propagation has advantages to address low seed viability and over exploitation problems. Thus, the objective of this study is to develop micropropagation method from shoot tip explant. To do so, seeds were de-coated and disinfected using 5% (v/v) Clorox and cultured on growth regulators-free solid MS medium. Shoots were initiated on MS medium containing BAP alone or in combination with IBA. Then, initiated shoots were multiplied on solid MS medium supplemented with various concentration and combinations of BAP and TDZ alone and in combination with IBA or NAA respectively. Shootlets were cultured on full, half and one-third strength MS medium containing 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 mg/l IBA and NAA for root induction. As a preliminary test for rooting, B5 and WPM media, both supplemented with 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg/l IBA, were used. Shootlets were cultured on full strength MS medium containing higher concentration of 3.0 and 5.0 mg/l IBA and 1.0 g/l activated charcoal for four days and then transferred into growth regulators-free MS medium for a month for root induction as preliminary test. The highest percentage of shoot induction (70.8%) was obtained on medium containing 0.5 mg/l BAP in combination with 0.01 mg/l IBA. The highest number of shoots (4.2 ± 0.85) produced per explant was achieved on MS multiplication medium containing 2.0 mg/l BAP. None of the shoots induced roots in any of different MS salt strengths and other media. As conclusion, this is the first try of micropropagation and the existing result is valuable for cryopreservation of this endangered plant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant Science InternationalSame topicPlant tissue culture and regenerationFrench-language works237,207