Systemic lupus erythematosus in the pediatric North American Native population of British Columbia.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the estimated prevalence and the phenotype of pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a North American Native population with other ethnic groups. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with SLE currently followed at the single tertiary care pediatric rheumatology clinic in our province. Data collected included demographic characteristics, family history, classification criteria for SLE, laboratory tests at diagnosis, SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) at presentation, and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) damage index at 6 months. RESULTS: The prevalence of SLE in our pediatric Native population is 8.8 per 100,000 (n = 6) compared to 3.3 per 100,000 in the non-NAI population (n = 34) (p = 0.037, Fisher's exact test; OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-6.3). Family history of rheumatic disease is more common in our Native children (5/6, 83%) compared to non-Native children (5/34, 15%) (p = 0.002 Fisher's exact test; OR 29, 95% CI 2.8-303.3). The sample size is too small for reliable interpretation of disease phenotype, autoantibodies, disease activity, and disease damage measures. CONCLUSION: There is an increased prevalence of SLE and familial autoimmunity among Native children in our population. Public health measures to screen children at risk may detect early disease and may reduce disease morbidity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".