MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2344207670 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2016.2530631

Controlled Switching of a 1200 MVA Transformer in Manitoba

2016· article· en· W2344207670 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsManitoba Hydro
FundersManitoba Hydro
KeywordsAutotransformerTransformerDelta-wye transformerWaveformEngineeringVoltageFlyback transformerIsolation transformerDistribution transformerInrush currentLinear variable differential transformerTransformer effectElectrical engineeringElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the application of a controlled switching device to energize a 500 kV/230 kV/46 kV, 1200 MVA autotransformer in Manitoba. The development of a detailed electromagnetic-transient (EMT) simulation model of the transformer formed the basis of the work described. The transformer model includes an accurate representation of hysteresis and remanance, which was validated using recorded waveforms and manufacturer data. This paper discusses a feasibility study conducted using this transformer model to evaluate the suitability of controlled switching to energize this transformer. A series of real-time hardware in the loop tests was conducted using a real-time simulator as part of precommissioning tests. The real-time simulation (RTS) tests and phase 1 of commissioning tests conducted in October 2014 showed that the controlled switching device would produce inaccurate residual flux estimates when it integrates the secondary voltage waveforms of a capacitive voltage transformer. Based on these RTS test results and EMT simulations, the installation of a wound potential transformer (PT) was recommended. This paper also discusses simulation studies conducted to manually program the controller until the PT was commissioned. During phase 2 of testing conducted in October 2015, a wound PT was commissioned and the controller was tested. The recorded waveforms showed good agreement with simulation results. The controller has accurately predicted residual flux and minimized inrush currents during transformer switching events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it