Asphaltene Aggregation Behavior in Bromobenzene Determined By Small-angle X-ray Scattering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) analyses of an asphaltene (a heptane-insoluble fraction in Canadian oil sand bitumen (CaAs)) at various concentrations in bromobenzene (BB) were performed at a synchrotron facility. BB is the first trial medium in which the aggregation behavior of asphaltenes has been elucidated, and is considered to be one of the “best” pure solvents for CaAs when determining the Hansen solubility parameters (HSP). Although the aggregation behavior of the CaAs in toluene (TL) and toluene–pentane mixed solvent (TL-PT10, containing 10% pentane on a volume basis) was confirmed to be similar to that reported in previous SAXS studies, the behavior in BB was markedly different. The results indicated that aggregates with a soft boundary of ∼30–60 Å in the radius of gyration ( R g ), which were observable in TL and TL-PT10, disappeared in BB and larger aggregates with a clear boundary appeared simultaneously. This phenomenon supported a colloidal aggregation model, with HSP analyses suggesting that BB dispersed the colloid surface fraction at the molecular level and isolated the colloid core fraction, which led to the formation of a rigid aggregation of the core fraction. The HSP analyses enabled us to evaluate the aggregation behavior quantitatively, and the results obtained by SAXS were consistent with those obtained by Rayleigh scattering that we reported previously.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".