Decisions Adverse to a Household - Protecting Social Housing Tenants under the Social Housing Reform Act and the Tenant Protection Act
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au moment de son 6lection en juin 1995, le Parti conservateur de l'Ontario proposait une plate-forme dlectorale qui comprenait l'abandon du programme relatif aux logements.I1 a tenu cette promesse et le logement social est maintenant administrd, en majeure partie, par les gouvernements municipaux plut6t que par la province.36 municipalities in southern Ontario, 10 District Social Services Administration Boards (DSSABs) in Northern Ontario and the City of Greater Sudbury.7.The transfer created 47 LHCs (Service Manager Update: Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, May 2002).8.The Social Housing Services Corporation (SHSC) is comprised of board members, service managers, and housing providers, including local housing corporations and the province.Its purpose is to address some social housing functions (such as group insurance, pooling of replacement reserves, and bulk purchasing) on a province-wide basis.9.The federal program co-ops in Ontario, administered by the Canada Housing and Mortgage Corporation (CHMC), were not affected by the transfer.The second stage transfer involved the termination of all operating agreements between the province and non-profit housing providers except agreements to which CHMC are a party (the CHMC programs are the pre-1986 private non-profit and municipal non-profit housing programs and Urban Native housing) and those being transferred to the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care and the Ministry of Community and Social Services.10.According to Lynn M. MacDonald, Assistant Deputy Minister, Social Housing Business Division, the transfer was "...by far the largest and most complex intra-jurisdictional transfer in the province's history."(Service Manager Update: Ministry of Housing and Municipal Affairs; May 2002).11.Prior to the SHRA, LHA's based their decisions on policies and procedures set out in the Local Housing Authority Administration Manual, and private non-profits on similar provincial policy manuals.12. O.Reg.298/01, Rent-Geared-to-Income Assistance and Special Needs Housing, came into effect on July 1, 2001.13.The term service manager is shorthand for CMSM, supra note 6.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.012 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".