MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2344538206 · doi:10.5539/gjhs.v8n12p45

Role of 14-Bp HLA-G, INDEL Polymorphism in Recurrent Miscarriage

2016· article· en· W2344538206 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fateme Afkhami, Neda Yazdani, Mahmoud Shekari Khaniani, Sima Mansoori Derakhshan

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Journal of Health Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive System and Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHLA-GHuman leukocyte antigenIndelFetusRecurrent miscarriagePregnancyImmune systemMiscarriagePlacentationBiologyGeneGeneticsPlacentaAntigenSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Mothers and their fetuses are hereditarily unlike. Surprisingly, no less than 50% human pregnancies reach full term despite the tendency of the immune system to eliminate of non-self units. Reduction of adaptive maternal immune answer, which is planned to reject strange factors, is essential for a pregnancy to reach full term. However, approximately 5% couples trying to conceive experience 2 recurrent miscarriages (RMs).</p><p>HLA-G, which is produced by the external trophectoderm layer and has unique biological features, is involved in the implantation and maintenance of fetus. Serum HLA-G levels are correlated with the risk of RM. Recent studies indicate that a 14-bp HLA-G, INDEL polymorphism decreases the level of <em>HLA-G</em> mRNA, which in turn decreases the amount of HLA-G produced. An understanding of gene parameter and the function of polymorphic sites in the functioning of <em>HLA-G</em> products may enable the development of approaches targeting <em>HLA-G</em> for more detail of causes of RM.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Journal of Health ScienceSame topicReproductive System and PregnancyFrench-language works237,207