MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2344640892 · doi:10.14740/jmc.v7i5.1996

An Intramucosal Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Arising Within a Tubulovillous Adenoma With High- Grade Dysplasia of the Rectosigmoid Colon Treated With Polypectomy

2016· article· en· W2344640892 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Youran Zou, Hong Shi, Meagan Costedio, Xiuli Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePolypectomyTubular adenomaVillous adenomaDysplasiaEndoscopic mucosal resectionSigmoid colonAdenomaGastroenterologyInternal medicineColonoscopyColorectal cancerCancerEndoscopyRectum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) has been previously reported to arise within preexisting adenoma but is usually at an advanced stage and carries a dismal prognosis and is almost always treated with surgical resection. Intramucosal NECs treated with polypectomy have not been reported. Herein, we report the first case of intramucosal NEC treated by polypectomy. An 87-year-old white male was referred to the Cleveland Clinic for a polyp detected in an outside hospital. A 40 mm sessile polyp was visualized in the recto-sigmoid colon using flexible sigmoidoscopy. Polypectomy was performed and histopathology revealed multiple fragments of tubulovillous adenoma (TVA) with extensive high-grade dysplasia (HGD). Notably, there was a focus (1 mm) of NEC confined to lamina propria and intimately related to the adenomatous component. This focus of intramucosal NEC was confirmed by its strong and diffuse synaptophysin and chromogranin A immunoreactivity and near 100% Ki-67 labeling index. Immunohistochemistry using a panel of antibodies against mismatch repair proteins was performed and both the adenomatous and NEC components had normal staining for MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6. This, to the best of our knowledge, is the first case of intramucosal NEC treated with polypectomy reported to date. Patient was alive 1 year after polypectomy. Clinical behavior remains to be seen with long-term follow-ups. J Med Cases. 2016;7(5):174-177 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jmc1996w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207