Maximizing Network Utility of Rechargeable Sensor Networks With Spatiotemporally Coupled Constraints
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies the network utility maximization (NUM) problem in static-routing rechargeable sensor networks (RSNs) with the link and battery capacity constraints. The NUM problem is very challenging as these two constraints are typically coupling in RSNs, which cannot be directly tackled. Existing works either do not fully consider the two coupled constraints together, or heuristically remove the temporally coupled part, both of which are not practical, and will also degrade the network performance. In this paper, we attempt to jointly optimize the sampling rate and battery level by carefully tackling the spatiotemporally coupled link and battery capacity constraints. To this end, we first decouple the original problem equivalently into separable subproblems by means of dual decomposition. Then, we propose a distributed algorithm in the context of joint rate and battery control, called decouple spatiotemporally-coupled constraint (DSCC), which can converge to the globally optimal solution. Numerical results, based on the real solar data, demonstrate that the proposed algorithm always achieves higher network utility than existing approaches. In addition, the impact of link/battery capacity and initial battery level on the network utility is further investigated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".