MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2344904820 · doi:10.14288/1.0059669

Reactions of small molecules with rhodium porphyrin complexes

2011· article· en· W2344904820 on OpenAlexaff
David C. Thackray

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhodiumPorphyrinChemistryMoleculePhotochemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reaction of Rh(OEP)(H) (OEP - 2,3 J,8,12,13,17,18-octaemylporphyrin) with O₂ in organic solvents was examined by visible, proton and phosphorus nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (nmr) as a candidate system for the net insertion of O₂ into the metal-hydride bond. The nmr data for a thermally unstable Rh[superscript]Ⅲ(OEP)(OOHXH₂0) mtennediate were obtained at -40 °C in CD₂C1₂- Addition of O₂ to CH₂CI₂ solutions of Rh(OEP)(H) with triphenylphosphine resulted in reaction with solvent forming Rh(OEP)(Cl)(PPh₃) and Rh(OEP)(CH₂Cl)(PPh₃) as the major species (in equimolar amounts), without concomitant formation of OPPh₃. The sensitivity of the reaction of Rh(OEP)(H) with O₂ to initial conditions, and the observation of products containing Rh (Ⅱ) and Rh-CH₂Cl, suggest a radical mechanism. Initiation/tenniriation: 2Rh(OEP)(H) ⇌ [Rh(OEP)]₂ + H₂ [Rh(OEP)]₂ ⇌ 2Rh(OEP)- and in the presence of PPh₃ [Rh(OEP)]₂+ PPh₃ ⇌ -Rh(OEP)(PPh₃) + Rh(OEP)- Propagation: Rh(OEP)- + O₂ ⇌ Rh(OEP)(O₂) Rh(OEP)( O₂) + Rh(OEP)(H) → Rh(OEP)(OOH) + Rh(OEP)- Teimination: Rh(OEP)(OOH) + Rh(OEP)(H) →[Rh(OEP)]₂ + H₂O +½O₂ and in the presence of PPh₃ •Rh(OEP)(PPh₃) + CH₂CI₂ ⇌ Rh(OEP)(Cl)(PPh₃) + ∙CH₂C1 Rh(OEP)∙ + ∙CH₂C1 ⇌Rh(OEP)(CH₂Cl) The reaction of Et₃N with Rh(por)(a)(L) (por = OEP or 5,10,15,20-tetramesitylporphyrin(TMP), L = H₂O, (CH₃)₂CHOH, CH₃CN) gave products, identified by visible (scanning and stopped-flow) and proton nmr spectroscopy to be Rh(por)(CH(Me)NEt₂), Et₂NH as Rh(por)(Cl)(Et₂NH), and Rh(por)(CH₂CHO). This indicated amine C-H and C-N cleavage and net one-electron reduction of Rh(Ⅲ) to Rh(Ⅱ) species ([Rh(OEP)]₂). Of other amines examined, aniline, N-methyl-diphenylamine and N-ethyl piperidine all formed complexes of the type Rh(OEP)(Cl)(amine). Proton Sponge and tributylamine with Rh(OEP)(Cl)(H₂O) give [Rh(OEP)]₂ as a major product under anaerobic conditions. Only the mechanism of the Et₃N system was examined in detail. Stopped-flow data indicated that Et₃N initially replaced L in the Rh[superscript]Ⅲ(por)(Cl)(L) species to form a Rh[superscript]Ⅲ(por)(Cl)(Et₃N) complex. An equilibrium involving reduction of Rh[superscript]Ⅲ to Rh[superscript]Ⅱ resulted and, in aromatic solvents under anaerobic conditions, slow reaction of Rh[superscript]Ⅱ(por) with Et₃N occurred to give Rh(por)(CH(Me)NEt₃). In CH₂CI₂, reaction of Et₃N with Rh(por)(Cl)(L) was fast, giving a mixture principally of Rh(por)(CH₂Cl)(amine) and the ɳ¹-ylidic enamine complex, Rh(por)(Cl)(CH₂CH=NEt₂) with minor mounts of Rh(por)(CH(Me)NEt₃). The Rh(por)(Cl)(CH₂CH=NEt₂) and Rh(por)(CH(Me)NEt₃) species were unstable, both ultimately giving Rh[superscript]Ⅲ(por)(Cl)(Et₂NH). The synthesis, along with characterization by visible, proton and phosphorus nmr spectroscopy, of the previously structurally characterised, mono-phosphine complex Rh(OEP)(Cl)(PPh₃) are presented. Additionally, spectroscopic evidence is presented for solution equilibria of Rh(OEP)(Cl)(PPh₃) involving formation of Rh(OEP)(L)₂+ (L = PPh₃, P[superscript]nBu₃) via thermal reactions, and Rh(OEP)(Cl)(L') (L'= CO, THF, CH₃CN) via photochemical processes. Thermodynamic data (ΔH⁰ = -33 ± 2 kJ mol⁻¹ and ΔS⁰ = -146 ±8 J K⁻¹mol⁻¹) have been estimated for formation of the bis(triphenylphospnine) species in CH₂CI₂: Rh(OEP)(Cl)(PPh₃) + PPh₃ [symbol omitted] [Rh(OEP)(PPh₃)₂]+ + Cl- Some complexes of Rh[superscript]Ⅲ(OEP) containing l,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)butane (dppb), l,2-bis((diphenylphospliino)ethane (dppe), bis(diphenylphosphino)methane (dppm) and 1,3-bis(diphenylphosphho)propane (dppp) have been characterized in situ using visible, proton and phosphorus nmr spectroscopy. The diphosphines (PP) are bound to Rh(Ⅲ) porphyrins in a monodentate dangling fashion (Rh[superscript]Ⅲ(OEP)(Cl)(PP) and [Rh[superscript]Ⅲ(OEP)(PP)₂]+), or a bridging mode between two metal centers ([Rh[superscript]Ⅲ(OEP)(Cl)]-μPP-[Rh[superscript]Ⅲ(OEP)(Cl)]).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine ChemistryFrench-language works237,207