MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2344937146 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2016.2527246

Post-Processed Thin-Film GMI Magnetic Sensors

2016· article· en· W2344937146 on OpenAlexaff
Saman Nazari Nejad, Raafat R. Mansour, Guo‐Xing Miao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGiant magnetoimpedanceMaterials scienceMicrofabricationFabricationThin filmCharacterization (materials science)Amorphous solidMagnetic fieldMiniaturizationComposite materialOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyGiant magnetoresistanceMagnetoresistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a multilayer thin-film giant magnetoimpedance (GMI) magnetic sensor is fabricated, and its performance is enhanced by post-processing treatment. The CoSiB alloy is developed to enhance the performance of multilayer thin-film GMI sensors. The material is studied for different post-processing magnetothermal conditions. The provided recipe will facilitate low-cost fabrication of GMI structures in conventional microfabrication facilities. A detailed study is carried out to investigate the effect of temperature, time, and external magnetic field on the results of the post-processing technique. The prepared samples are tested with various magnetics and material characterization tools in order to give a detailed understanding of these effects. The post-processing shows a significant impact on the magnetic properties of the material. It is demonstrated that some nanoclusters of cobalt (with a diameter of 2-4 nm) form in its amorphous matrix structure, enhancing the permeability of the material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MagneticsSame topicMetallic Glasses and Amorphous AlloysFrench-language works237,207