Digitally Modulated CMOS Polar Transmitters for Highly-Efficient mm-Wave Wireless Communication
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A polar transmitter (TX) is implemented at 60 GHz, enabling a power amplifier (PA) to operate in saturation where efficiency is highest, even when handling higher order modulations such as QPSK and 16-QAM. The phase path is upconverted by I-Q mixers, while the amplitude path modulates an RF-DAC. Aimed at 802.11ad applications, the 10 GS/s (i.e., 6x-oversampled) polar TX realizes more than 30 dB alias attenuation, and the input bandwidth exceeds 3.1 GHz. The PA saturated output power is 10.8 dBm with 29.8% drain efficiency at the maximum RF-DAC code. Average output power is 8.1 dBm with 22.3% drain efficiency at <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$-20.7\;\text{dB}$</tex-math></inline-formula> EVM for QPSK modulation without RF-DAC predistortion. The corresponding 16-QAM values are: 7.2 dBm average output power with 19.8% efficiency at <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$-16.5\;\text{dB}$</tex-math></inline-formula> EVM. With predistortion, a QPSK modulated output achieves 5.3 dBm average power with 15.3% efficiency at <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$-23.6\;\text{dB}$</tex-math></inline-formula> EVM, while 3.6 dBm average power with 11.6% efficiency at <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$-18.1\;\text{dB}$</tex-math></inline-formula> EVM is realized for 16-QAM. For a sampling rate of 10 GS/s, the TX data rates are 3.33 Gb/and 6.67 Gb/s for QPSK and 16-QAM, respectively. Implemented in 40 nm bulk-CMOS, the core circuit occupies <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.18\text{mm}^{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula> core of the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2.38\text{mm}^{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula> total die area, and consumes 40.2 mW from a 0.9 V supply.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it