MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2345022821 · doi:10.1109/tap.2016.2560958

On New Triangle Quadrature Rules for the Locally Corrected Nyström Method Formulated on NURBS-Generated Bézier Surfaces in 3-D

2016· article· en· W2345022821 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Shafieipour, Jonatan Aronsson, Ian Jeffrey, Chen Nui, Vladimir Okhmatovski

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersGeorgia Institute of Technology
KeywordsQuadrilateralGaussian quadratureQuadrature (astronomy)Numerical integrationMathematicsGauss–Kronrod quadrature formulaClenshaw–Curtis quadratureTanh-sinh quadratureGauss–Laguerre quadratureAdaptive quadratureBézier curveMathematical analysisApplied mathematicsAlgorithmGeometryComputer scienceNyström methodIntegral equationFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonuniform rational b-splines (NURBS) are the most widely used technique in today's geometric computer-aided design systems for modeling surfaces. Combining the locally corrected Nyström (LCN) method with NURBS requires formulating LCN on both quadrilateral and triangular Bézier surfaces, as a typical NURBS-generated Bézier mesh includes elements of both the types. While on quadrilateral elements the product of 1-D Gaussian quadrature rules can be applied to LCN effectively, Gaussian integration rules available for triangles cannot efficiently be applied to LCN for two reasons. First, they do not possess the same number of quadrature points as the number of functions in a complete set of polynomial basis at an arbitrary order. Second, they exacerbate the condition number of the resulting matrix equation at higher orders due to an increasing density of quadrature points near the edges and corners of triangles. In this paper, we construct a new set of quadrature rules for Bézier triangles (i.e., degenerate quadrilaterals) based on the Newton-Cotes (equidistant) quadrature rules and apply these rules to the LCN solution of the electric, magnetic, and combined field integral equations. Results show that the new family of quadrature rules overcomes both the aforementioned issues and can be applied to LCN effectively for orders from 0 to 9, inclusively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicAdvanced Numerical Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207