MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2345320072 · doi:10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n3p44

Posted Workers Directive 96/71/EC in the Framework of Free Movement of Services

2016· article· en· W2345320072 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Senada Reçi

Bibliographic record

VenueMediterranean Journal of Social Sciences · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolish Legal and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDirectiveFree movementLegislationDirective on Privacy and Electronic CommunicationsJurisprudenceMember stateDisplacement (psychology)State (computer science)Movement (music)LawBusinessInterpretation (philosophy)Political scienceMember statesData Protection DirectiveComputer scienceEuropean unionEuropean Union lawInternational tradePsychologyAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to analyze Directive 96/71 on posted workers which regulate an aspect of free movement of services, that of moving workers from one state to another state within the movement of services. Provisions of directive 96/71 aim to remove obstacles and uncertainties and limitations that affect the implementation of the free movement of services in the displacement of workers from one country to another. Issues Laval, Viking, and interpretation of the jurisprudence of the ECJ occupy a prominent place in this paper, after serving as guides for the implementation of the Directive by the Member States, as well as various conflicts between national legislation regarding the status of displaced workers and their rights provided by the Directive. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n3p44

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.011
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0230.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMediterranean Journal of Social SciencesSame topicPolish Legal and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207