Clavicle Fracture Is Not Predictive of the Need for Microsurgery in Brachial Plexus Birth Palsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Brachial plexus birth palsy (BPBP) and clavicle fractures occur concurrently as well as in isolation during difficult deliveries. The concept that concurrent clavicle fracture may spare nerve injury has been advocated. Our aim was to compare those children with BPBP presenting to a tertiary care center with and without concurrent clavicle fractures and assess the utility of the presence of a clavicle fracture as a predictor of injury severity in children with BPBP. METHODS: Records of all patients belonging to a large prospective multicenter cohort study of infants with BPBP (Treatment and Outcomes of Brachial Plexus Injuries study) were analyzed for demographic information and birth information including risk factors, comorbidity, presence of clavicle fracture, and injury severity. RESULTS: The records of 639 children with BPBP were examined. Thirteen patients were excluded for incomplete data. Ninety-six children who sustained concurrent birth fracture and BPBP were identified (15%). Of these, 57 sustained clavicle fractures (9%), 44 sustained humerus fractures, and 4 sustained other fractures. Of the demographic factors analyzed, only the presence of gestational diabetes was found to be significantly higher in those children with fractures versus those without. The presence of a clavicle fracture did not change the rate of microsurgical intervention, nor did clavicle fracture rates differ by Toronto score, suggesting that there was no difference in injury severity between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In a large multicenter prospective study, 9% of children presenting with BPBP also sustained a clavicle fracture at birth. The presence of a clavicle fracture did not correlate with the severity of brachial plexus injury. We suggest that in study populations of children with severe enough BPBP to present to a tertiary care center, compared with studies collected in the obstetric population, the presence of a clavicle fracture is neither protective from nerve injury nor predictive of injury severity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2-prognostic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".