The radio/X‐ray correlation in Swift J1753.5–0127
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Great effort has gone into trying to explain the two observed radio/X‐ray correlation tracks seen in the low/hard state of black hole X‐ray binaries in recent years. The original, “standard” correlation of the form L R ∝ L b X , where b = 0.7 ± 0.1, is paired with a separate, lower correlation track with a steeper slope of ∼ 1–1.4, at least at high luminosities. These outlier sources seem to show fainter radio emission than expected for a given X‐ray luminosity, thus acquiring the term “radio‐quiet”. While most sources seem to maintain their intrinsic correlation slopes over decades in luminosity, a growing sample of sources have recently been reported to move from one correlation to the other. We present preliminary results from a coordinated radio/X‐ray monitoring campaign of the radio‐quiet black hole binary Swift J1753.5–0127, spanning nearly two years in time. Our observations add lower‐luminosity coverage to an existing sample of observations, and we observe the radio‐quiet track to proceed horizontally towards the standard correlation as the X‐ray luminosity slowly starts to decrease. The source stays on the transition track for ∼ 60 days, during which its X‐ray luminosity is observed to drop by more than an order of magnitude while its radio luminosity stays constant. Time‐averaged X‐ray energy spectra show very little change during this phase, leaving no obvious parameters to explain the observed transition behaviour. (© 2016 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".