MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2346333783 · doi:10.1149/ma2014-02/7/523

Slice-Selective NMR Diffusion Measurements - a Tool for the Characterization of Ion Transport Properties in Lithium Ion Battery Electrolytes

2014· article· en· W2346333783 on OpenAlexaff
Ion C. Halalay, Sergey Krachkovskiy, Allen D. Pauric, Gillian R. Goward

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteContext (archaeology)Materials scienceCharacterization (materials science)Battery (electricity)Lithium (medication)DiffusionIonDegradation (telecommunications)Lithium-ion batteryDurabilityNanotechnologyComputer scienceElectrodeChemistryComposite materialPower (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main impediments to the wide-spread acceptance of electric drive vehicles are the cost, energy storage capacity, and durability of Li-ion batteries. The first issue is best addressed within the context of materials and batteries manufacturing, the second by research on the synthesis and characterization of new materials. Successfully tacking of the third issue requires an improved understanding of battery degradation mechanisms and the development of suitable mitigation measures. In situ experimental techniques which can accurately detect and monitor performance degradation mechanisms at the nanoscale, including the identities of short-lived chemical species, or changes in materials properties as functions of temperature, position or time are emerging only gradually, due to their associated difficulties and complex challenges. We show that the combination of in situ one-dimensional imaging and slice-selective NMR diffusion measurements (Fig. 1) is a tool for spatially and temporally resolving the lithium self-diffusion coefficient in a liquid electrolyte during the application of a dc current (Fig. 2). A solution of 1M LiTFSI in propylene carbonate was used for our method development work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicAdvancements in Battery Materials→French-language works237,207→