MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2346848354 · doi:10.1180/minmag.2016.080.008

Magnesio-ferri-fluoro-hornblende from Portoscuso, Sardinia, Italy: description of a newly approved member of the amphibole supergroup

2016· article· en· W2346848354 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMineralogical Magazine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersUniversità degli Studi di PaviaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsHornblendePleochroismCrystallographyMonoclinic crystal systemMohs scale of mineral hardnessAmphiboleSupergroupFormula unitMineralChemistryHolotypeHematiteGeologyMineralogyCrystal structureGeochemistryQuartzBiotiteGenus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Magnesio-ferri-fluoro-hornblende has the ideal formula A□B Ca 2 C(Mg 4 Fe 3+ )T(Si 7 Al)O 22 W F 2 (Hawthorne et al., 2012). The holotype sample described in this work occurs as prismatic crystals in vugs of volcanic rocks (Seruci ignimbrites), found along the coast road ∼5.5 km northeast of Portoscuso, Cagliari, Sardinia; associated minerals are tridymite, todorokite, magnetite, and hematite. The name and the mineral were approved by the IMA CNMNC (2014-091). Holotype magnesio-ferri-fluoro-hornblende is monoclinic, space group C2/m, a = 9.839(5), b = 18.078(9), c = 5.319(3) Å, β = 104.99(3)°, V = 913.9(9) Å 3 , Z = 2. The density calculated from the empirical formula is 3.315 g cm–3. In plane-polarized light, magnesio-ferri-fluoro-hornblende is pleochroic, X = pale grey (least), Y = dark grey (most), Z = pale brownish grey (intermediate); X^ a = 47.6° (β obtuse), Y // b, Z^ c = 33.4° (β acute). It is biaxial negative, α = 1.669, β = 1.676, γ = 1.678, all ±0.002; 2V obs = 74(1)°, 2V calc = 56°. The strongest eight lines in the powder X-ray diffraction pattern are [d in Å (I)(hkl)]: 2.711 (100)(151), 8.412 (89)(110), 3.121 (64)(310), 2.553 (61)(2̄02), 3.389 (55)(131), 2.599 (45)(061), 2.164 (36)(261), and 2.738 (34)(3̄31). Electron-microprobe analysis of the refined crystal gave SiO 2 45.34, Al 2 O 3 6.18, TiO 2 1.22, FeO 15.24, Fe 2 O 3 6.27, MgO 9.71, MnO 0.78, ZnO 0.06, CaO 10.18, Na 2 O 1.35, K2O 1.15, F 3.22, Cl 0.30, H2Ocalc 0.37, sum 99.95 wt.%. The empirical formula unit, calculated on the basis of 24 (O, OH, F, Cl) apfu with (OH + F + Cl) = 2 apfu is: (Na 0.15 K 0.22 ) ∑0.37 (Na 0.25 Ca 1.66 Mn 0.09 ) ∑2.00 (Mg 2.20 Fe 2+ 1.94 Mn 0.01 Zn 0.01 Fe 3+ 0.72 Ti 0.13 ) ∑5.01 (Al 1.11 Si 6.89 ) ∑8.00 O 22 [F 1.55 (OH) 0.37 Cl 0.08 ) ∑2.00.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it