MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2346852414 · doi:10.1039/c6fo00228e

The formation and breakdown of structured clots from whole milk during gastric digestion

2016· article· en· W2346852414 on OpenAlexaff
Aiqian Ye, Jian Cui, Douglas G. Dalgleish, Harjinder Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueFood & Function · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProteins in Food Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigestion (alchemy)ChemistryFood scienceBiophysicsChromatographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The behaviour of milk fat globules in the coagula of unheated and heated (90 °C for 20 min) whole milk during gastric digestion was investigated using a human gastric simulator. Structured protein clots were formed by a coagulation process that was driven by the action of the milk-clotting enzyme, pepsin, on the protein fraction of the whole milk. The fat globules in the milk appeared to be embedded in the clots as they formed. After clot formation, the different structures of the clots formed with unheated and heated whole milk led to different rates of protein hydrolysis by pepsin and resulted in the release of fat globules from the clots into the digesta; the release of fat globules was faster in the clots from the heated whole milk. Comparison of the rates of fat globule release from the clots and the rates of the reduction in fat-free matter in the clots showed that the release of fat globules from the clots from both unheated and heated milk was linearly dependent on the breakdown of the protein in the clots. Coalescence of fat globules appeared to occur in the gastric digesta and also within the protein.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations123
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood & FunctionSame topicProteins in Food SystemsFrench-language works237,207