Three-dimensional EOS Analysis of Apical Vertebral Rotation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Apical vertebral rotation (AVR) is increasingly recognized as one of the important radiographic parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). EOS enables us to precisely measure AVR by 3-dimensional reconstruction. The objective of the present study was to describe the postoperative correction and the long-term follow-up of AVR in posterior spinal fusion with direct vertebral rotation and elucidate the factors that affected the correction. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 153 consecutive posterior spinal fusion surgeries for AIS performed between 2009 and 2012. Among them, 55 patients who fulfilled the study inclusion criteria with complete preoperative, immediate postoperative, and last follow-up (>1 y) EOS images were included in the present study. EOS 3-dimentional reconstructions were undertaken for each patient. Postoperative AVR correction and the loss of correction were calculated. RESULTS: Preoperative AVR of the major curve averaged 19 degrees (SD=7 degrees), and AVR on immediate postoperative images averaged 9 degrees (SD=6 degrees, P<0.001). AVR at final follow-up averaged 11 degrees (SD=6 degrees, P=0.06). Postoperative correction was larger in all-screw construct than in hybrid construct (55% vs. 36%, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The present study is the first study to measure AVR in a large population of AIS patients using EOS 3-dimensional reconstruction. We report the correction magnitude was significantly affected by the construct. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-therapeutic study (case series).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".