Combination of acupuncture and pricking-cupping bloodletting therapy for cervical spondylosis of qi stagnation and blood stasis pattern
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of acupuncture and pricking-cupping blood letting therapy in treating cervical spondylosis of qi stagnation and blood stasis pattern.Methods Eighty cases were divided into treatment group and control group by randomized single blind controlled trail method.After qi arrival,kept the needle for 20min,then withdrew the needles,and treated by cupping on Ashi points for 3~5min.Patients in treatment group were treated by pricking-cupping bloodletting method.The TCM quantization tables,McGill questionnaire,evaluation form of cervical spondylosis function were evaluated,and the safety and adverse events were recorded.Results The total effective rate was 95.0%in the treatment group and 92.5%in the control group,with a difference between the two groups(P0.05).There was significant difference in TCM syndrome between the two groups(P0.05);the reduction of PRI,VAS and PPI in treatment group were much more than that of the controls(P0.05);the improvement of cervical spondylosis function in treatment group was higher than that of the controls(P0.001).Conclusion Combined acupuncture and pricking-cupping bloodletting therapy has better effects than combined acupuncture and cupping therapy,especially in pain alleviating aspect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".