A CLINICAL STUDY OF INFLUENCE ON INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE AND SKIN TEMPERATURE AFTER STELLATE GANGLION BLOCK AND IRRADIATION OF POLARIZED LIGHT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To study the influences on intraocular pressure and skin temperature after stellate ganglion block and irradiation of polarized light,and to clarify the similarities and differences of the two methods.Methods: 50 pain clinic patients were assigned randomly to two groups,SGB group(25 cases) and SGL group(25 cases).Intraocular pressure and skin temperature of both sides were meagured using YZ7A pitting intraocular pressometer and UY200M temperature monitor.Results: The intraocular pressure of SGB group and SGL group showed significant differences after 10 minutes of the operation(P0.05),and showed no significant differences at other points of time(P0.05) .The skin temperature of two groups showed significant differences after 5 minutes of the operation(P0.05),and very significant differences after 10 and 15 minutes(P0.01),and no significant differences at other points of time(P0.05).Conclusion: After SGB and SGL,the intraocular pressure was rise up temporary then came down,and temperature of skin was rise up.Influences of SGB and SGL on intraocular pressure and temperature of skin were similar,and the clinical effects of the two methods were basically the same.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".