MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2347867083

Paleomagnetic poles of mafic dyke swarms from the North China craton and their relevance to the reconstruction of the supercontinent Columbia.

2009· article· en· W2347867083 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hou Gui

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Petrologica Sinica · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupercontinentCratonGeologyPaleomagnetismBaddeleyiteZirconGeochemistryApparent polar wanderSnowball EarthPaleontologyPrecambrianMaficTectonicsGlacial period
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One geomagnetic pole and two virtual geomagnetic poles (VGPs) are now available from U-Pb dated dyke swarms/ individual dykes from the Eastern Block, Central Zone and Western Block of the North China craton. The precise baddeleyite U-Pb age of Hengshan GU dyke in the Central Zone is 1769±3Ma and is part of the Taihang dyke swarm. This swarm has yielded a paleomagnetic pole position at Plat =36°N, Plong = 247°E(dp = 2°, dm =4°). A dyke at location DY in the Eastern Block of the North China craton yields a baddeleyite U-Pb age of a baddeleyite 1620.8±6.9Ma, and a VGP at Plat =6.9°N, Plong = 81.9°E {dp = 4.31°,dm=6.09°). A nearby dyke at site LW4 gives a zircon SHRIMP U-Pb age of 1157±18Ma, and a VGP at Plat =27.1°N, Plong = 162°E( dp = 15.8°, dm = 18.7°). Although secular variation has not been removed from the Shandong data, comparison of these three paleomagnetic pole positions of the North China craton with the Mesoproterozoic APWP of the Canadian Shield allows a continental reconstruction whereby the North China craton joined the supercontinent Columbia with the Canadian Shield from 1800 to 1600Ma, and the North China craton separated from the Canadian Shield sometime between 1600 to 1200Ma in response to the final break-up of the supercontinent Columbia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Petrologica SinicaSame topicGeological and Geophysical StudiesFrench-language works237,207