Effect of Soaking with Acid and Aluminum on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Raphanus sativus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Effects of soaking with different acid and aluminum(Al) stress on seed germination and seedling growth of radish(Raphanus sativus) were investigated.The results showed that medium intensity of acid and Al stress(pH≤4.5,Al concentration 100 to 1 000 μmol/L) did not have significant influence on seed germination,while had significant positive influence on germination power,germination index,vigor index,and negative influence on seedling growth such as root,stem and seedling length,root and aboveground fresh weight.In the low concentrations of Al treatments(0 to 10 μmol/L),the seedling growth increased firstly and then decreased with pH value changing from 5.5 to 3.5.In the medium and high concentrations of Al treatments(100 to 5 000 μmol/L),the seedling growth decreased with the decreasing of pH value.While the seedling growth showed a decreased trend with increasing of Al concentrations,especially for root,thus root was the most sensitive part.These results indicated that radish seed germination period was more tolerant to acid and Al stress than seedling growth.When pH value was under 4.5,the Al concentration was 1 000 μmol/L,which could significantly inhibit the seedling growth of radish.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".