MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2348218405 · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/34/1/012035

A novel technique for mapping the disparity of off-terrain objects

2016· article· en· W2348218405 on OpenAlexaff
Alaeldin Suliman, Yiyun Zhang, Raid Al-Tahir

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerrainComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer graphics (images)GeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Third-dimension information is of a great importance for several remote sensing applications, such as building detection. The main data-source for these applications is very high resolution (VHR) satellite images which allow detailed mapping of complex environments. Stereo VHR satellite images allow the extraction of two correlated types of third-dimension information: disparity and elevation information. While the disparity is measured directly, the elevation information is derived computationally. To measure the disparity information, two overlapped images are matched. However, for the backward and forward off-nadir VHR stereo images, building facades occlude areas and hence create many data gaps. When the disparity is required to represent only the off-terrain objects, interpolation and normalization techniques are typically used. However, in dense urban environments, these techniques destroy the quality of the generated data. Therefore, this paper proposes a registration-based technique to measure the disparity of the above-ground objects. The technique includes constructing epipolar images and registering them using common terrain- level features to allow direct disparity mapping for the off-terrain objects. After the implementation, the negative effects of occlusion in the off-nadir VHR stereo images are mitigated through direct disparity mapping of the above-ground objects and bypassing the interpolation and normalization steps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceSame topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207