MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2348413772

Effect observation of dermabrasion in the shock phase of children extensive deep partial thickness burns

2013· article· en· W2348413772 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chen Xiang-ju

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWound Healing and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEscharDermabrasionSurgeryIncidence (geometry)Skin graftingAnesthesiaBurn woundErythemaWound healing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To analyze the clinical effect of children with large area of deep Ⅱ degree burn shock stage eschar grinding and two methods in the treatment of eschar shaving,in order to find a more ideal method for treating children with large area deep burn wounds. Methods Sixty cases of large area deep burn hospitalized children were selected in department from 2008 February to 2012 February,including 32 male cases,28 female cases. The ages ranged from 1 to 4 years,averaged (3. 5±0. 5) years old,and total burn area was 15% -31% TBSA,the average was (20. 2±1. 9) % TBSA. According to different treatments,all the burn children were divided into escharectomy group and dermabrasion group,30 cases each group. After admission all the cases were deserved perfect preoperative examination and adequate fluidresuscitation. When staying stable vital signs,all the patients received tangential or eschar grinding operation under anesthesia within 24 hours after injury. The two groups were observed the infusion volume at shock stage,the incidence of postoperative complications and residual wound and the rate of skin grafting operation,the wound healing time,wound healing quality index. Results The first 24th hour infusion volume of the dermabrasion group (1865.2±220.2) mL less than that of the tangential group (2150.9±234. 5) mL(P0.05) . The incidence rate of postoperative complications (40%) and digestive disorders (13.33%) of the dermabrasion group were lower than that of the tangential group (93.33%,36.67%) (P0.05) . The incidence of residual wounds (13.33%) ,and skin grafting operation rate (6.67%) of the dermabrasion group were lower than that of the tangential group (36.67%, 26.67%) (P0. 05) . Wound healing time of the dermabrasion group (16.97±2.45) d was shorter than that of the tangential group (24. 22±1.12) d (P0.05) . Wound healing quality of the dermabrasion group Vancouver score (5.56±1.32) was below than that of the tangential group Vancouver score (9. 61±1.20) (P0.05) . Conclusions The treatment of eschar grinding at the shock stage has little effect on the vital signs of the children with large area of deep Ⅱ degree burn,and has the advantages of simple operation,less complications,side light injury,wound healing fast,light scar. It is a good and more practical method to treat large area of deep Ⅱ degree burn wounds early.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing→Same topicWound Healing and Treatments→French-language works237,207→