Relation between mother's alexithymia and children's internalizing behavior problems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To explore the gender difference of preschoolers' internalizing behavior problems,and to examine the relation between mother's alexithymia and preschoolers' internalizing behavior problems.Methods: There are 446 preschoolers from six kindergardens in Suzhou participated in the study.The 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale(TAS-20)was used to measure the alexithymia of these preschoolers' mother.Preschoolers' internalizing behavior problems were assessed by Child Behavior Checklist(CBCL).Results:(1) Significant differences of preschoolers' internalizing behavior problems were found between boys and girls.Boys explicitly had more compulsive behavior problems than girls,while girls significantly had more depressive tendency than boys.(2) Mother's alexithymia had significant predictive effect on preschoolers' internalizing behavior problems.Mother's difficulty identifying feeling was positively associated with preschoolers' depressive mood,social withdrawal and compulsive behavior.Mother's difficulty describing feeling was positively associated with children's depressive tendency.Conclusion: Mother's alexithymia may have big influence on preschoolers' internalizing behavior problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".