Preparation and characterization of CuO nanopowders doped (Ba_(0.87)Ca_(0.09)Sr_(0.04))(Ti_(0.90)Zr_(0.04)Sn_(0.06))O_3-based Y5V ceramics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim To study the effects of different amount of CuO nano-powders and sintering temperature on the microstructures and the dielectric properties of BCSTZS ceramics by preparing(Ba0.87Ca0.09Sr0.04)(Ti0.90Zr0.04Sn0.06)O3 ceramics(BCSTZS) with CuO nano-powders as sintering aids.Methods A series of BCSTZS ceramics as samples were synthesized by doping CuO nano-powders with solid phase method,then not only were the samples characterized with XRD,TEM and SEM methods but also dielectric properties of the ceramics were measured.Results The density and dielectric constant of ceramics increased obviously with the increase of the Nb content in the low-temperature sintering.In all the additive systems,the single addition of CuO nano-powders was an effective way to lower the sintering temperature of BCSTZS ceramics from 1 300 ℃ to 1 150 ℃.When CuO nano-powders of 1.5%(wt/wt) was mixed with BCSTZS powders,the derived ceramics demonstrated dense microstructure with a high dielectric constant(emax=8 690),low dielectric loss 1.67% and met the EIA Y5V standard.Conclusion The ceramics synthesized by doping CuO nano-powders with solid phase method feature less pores,higher density,more uniform grain size and homogeneous distribution.The method can be used to prepare the BSCTZS-based ceramics which meet Y5V standard,so this study has important application prospect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it