MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2349536855

Effect of Silicone on Plant seed Germination under the Allelopathic Effects of Eucalyptus Leaves Water Extract

2010· article· en· W2349536855 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaofei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAllelopathy and phytotoxic interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllelopathySeedlingGerminationShootBiologyEucalyptusAgronomyRadiataLolium perenneBotanyEucalyptus globulusHorticultureVignaPoaceae
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis used the methods of tolallyrandom experiment design and potted plants to study the effects of different level of Eucalyptus leaves flooding extract on seed germination and seedling growth of four receptor plant of Vigna radiata,Zea mays,Lolium perenne,Oryza sativa,to explor the stress mechanism of the source material,silicon which threatens the flooding extract of four receptor Eucalyptus.The results were as fol-lows:(1) The allelopathic effect was not significant for Lolium perenne,but germination percentage,germina-tion index,seedling growth of Zea mays and Vigna radiate were inhibited significantly,and the inhibition of seedling shoot was stronger than that of bud.With the increasing of Eucalyptus leaves water extract concentra-tion,shoot activity of four receptor plant decreased continuely.(2) Adding silicon was conducive to enhance the capacities of remitting the allelopathic effect of Eucalyptus leaves water extract for four receptor plants.And seed germination,seedling growth and biomass liveweight increased significantly,and shoot activity strength-ened.Different receptor plant had different allelopathic effects to Eucalyptus leaves water extract,and the stress abilities of Si to Eucalyptus water extract were different.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicAllelopathy and phytotoxic interactionsFrench-language works237,207