Studies on the Variation of Seed Traits of Cephalotaxus fortunei in Fujian Province
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studied Cephalotaxus fortunei seed's variation regulation from the aspect of seed shape characters.The results showed that there was extreme sigmificant difference among the charactersts of the C.fortunei seeds,including the length,the width,the thickness,the weight,and the side.On the correlation of seeds characters with germination percentage,there had certain positive correlation between C.fortunei seeds germination percentage and it's length,width,thickness,the ratio of length to width,the single grain weight,proportion and side etc,and the latter three characters had significant or extreme significant correlation with germination percentage,but the ratio of seeds length to thickness and seeds width to thickness had significant of extreme significant negative correlation with germination percentage.Cluster analysis showed that all the tested seeds but F 9 source from YongTai,could be divided into two types at D 0.407,ie seeds characters had obvious difference and no distinct difference from other populations,the former source from Zhangping,and the latter origin from Yongtai Huangxi and Zherong.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".