MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2349747127

Effect of different fillers on aerobic composting of dewatered sludge

2013· article· en· W2349747127 on OpenAlexaff
LI Shuqi

Bibliographic record

VenueDongbei Nongye Daxue xuebao · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPolymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuskFly ashCompostStrawSewage sludgeWaste managementEnvironmental scienceFertilizerPulp and paper industrySoil conditionerFiller (materials)AgronomySewageEnvironmental engineeringMaterials scienceSoil waterBiologyEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The method of aerobic windrow composting was used in this experiment. It was studied that effects of straw and rice husk as bulking agents and conditioner, zeolite and fly ash as adjusting agent on sewage sludge composting, in order to provide the basis for reasonable land utilization of sludge. The test results showed that: the straw treatment groups all reached the standard of harmless and decomposed, but rice husk treatment groups did not reach the standard; fly ash treatments and zeolite treatments were no differences. Under the condition of straw as bulking agents and conditioner,fly ash or zeolite as adjusting agent, sludge was composted. Fertilizer index after composting had reached the national standard for organic fertilizer. There were more development prospects with waste straw and fly ash as the sludge compost filler.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDongbei Nongye Daxue xuebaoSame topicPolymer-Based Agricultural EnhancementsFrench-language works237,207