MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2349780522

The effect of quality characterizes of surimi stored by superchilling

2012· article· en· W2349780522 on OpenAlexaff
Qian Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueFood Science and Technology International · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMeat and Animal Product Quality
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTBARSFood scienceChemistryShelf lifeCold storageFreezing pointCarpFish <Actinopterygii>FisheryPhysicsBiologyBiochemistryAntioxidantThermodynamicsHorticultureLipid peroxidation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the quality characterizes of surimi of carp at two different conditions of superchilling and cold preservation.The freezing point of surimi,and its pH value,a value,TBARS values,carbonyl content and the sensory were studied.The result showed that the freezing point of surimi is-1.5 ℃.Its pH value,TBARS values and carbonyl content increased with the increasing of the storage time(P0.05).But a value decreased with the increasing of the storage time(P0.05).The sensory of surimi stored at superchilling was better than that stored at cold preservation(P0.05).These results indicated that Controlled Freezing-point Technology have great effect on improving the quality characterizes of surimi and prolong its shelf life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood Science and Technology InternationalSame topicMeat and Animal Product QualityFrench-language works237,207