Clinical Efficacy of Olanzapine in the Treatment of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia in Senile Patients
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the efficacy of Olanzapine in the treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia(BPSD) in senile patients.Methods 74 senile patients with BPSD admitted to our hospital or at clinic from January 2011 to October 2011 were treated with Olanzapine and all the patients were observed for eight weeks.Brief psychiatric rating scale(BPRS) and Montreal cognitive assessment(MoCA) were used to assess the efficacy before the treatment and at the first week,the second week,the fourth weeks and the eighth week of the treatment.Results After eight weeks treatment,the total score of MoCA was(20.196±4.537),and the score was(17.332±5.241) before the treatment.The difference was statistically significant(t=1.745,P0.05).The total BPRS score and each factor score at the first week,the second week,the fourth week and the eighth week of treatment all showed statistically significant differences compared with those before the treatment(P0.05).The total BPRS score at the first week,the second week,the fourth week and the eighth week of treatment all showed statistically significant differences compared with each factor score(P0.05).Adverse reactions were somnolence in seven cases,feebleness in three cases,dizziness in three cases,headache in one case and unsteady walking in one case.No one had cardiac dysfunction.Conclusion The clinical efficacy of Olanzapine in the treatment of BPSD in senile patients is positive with good safety.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it