MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2350852627

The anxiolytic effect and mechanism of indole derivate I_(20)

2002· article· en· W2350852627 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Hong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroactive steroidAnxiolyticElevated plus mazeGABAA receptorBenzodiazepinePharmacologyChemistryReceptorInternal medicineOpen fieldSedationMechanism of actionEndocrinologyMedicineBiochemistryIn vitro
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM To investigate the anxiolytic effect and mechanism of action of the indo derivative I 20 ,a ligand of the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor. METHODS The anxiolytic effect was tested in the elevated plus maze and the light dark box. The content of progesterone in the rat plasma after injection of various doses of drugs in different time points was measured by radio immunoassay . RESULTS Compound I 20 (1 mg·kg -1 , ip) exhibited the anxiolytic effect in mice by increasing the time percentage into the open arms in the elevated plus maze and the number of transitions in the light dark box. I 20 failed to affect the locomotor activity in mice in the test dose(20 mg·kg -1 ,ip),suggesting I 20 did not induce sedation in the anxiolytic doses. I 20 induced a dose dependent and time dependent increase in the concentrations of the neurosteroid (progesterone) in the rat plasma. CONCLUSION The indole derivative I 20 may produce anxiolytic like effect by interacting with the PBR receptor, promoting the biosynthesis of neurosteroid progesterone and modulating the GABA A function indirectly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOrganic Chemistry Cycloaddition ReactionsFrench-language works237,207