Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To investigate the effect of warm acupancture-moxibustion in patients with osteoarthritis(OA) of knee. Method:Patients with OA of knee were randomly assigned to warm acupuncture-moxibustion group(n=30) ,drug treatment group(n=30) and waiting control group(n=30) . Warm acupuncture-moxibustion or Ibuprofen was applied to the corresponding group respectively in 10 sessions over 2 weeks.The patieuts in waiting control group didn′t receive any acupuncture at the first 2 weeks,but 2 weeks later received warm acupuncture-moxibustion treatment for 2 weeks. Patients completed standard questionnaires at baseline and after 2 weeks. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis(WOMAC) and SF-36 index were used to evaluate the outcome at the end of week 0 and 2. Result:Significant differences on WOMAC and SF-36 scores were found between before and after 2-week treatment in warm acupuncture-moxibustion group and drug treatment group(P0.05) . There were no difference between warm acupuncture-moxibustion group and drug treatment group after 2-week treatment(P0.05) . Conclusion:The results suggested that warm acupuncture-moxibustion is an effective and safe therapy to patients with OA of knee.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".