MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2351505131

Preparation of Egg White Peptide and Its Growth-Promoting Activity for Lactobacillus bulgaricus

2014· article· en· W2351505131 on OpenAlexaff
Ren Jin

Bibliographic record

VenueFood Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEgg whiteHydrolysisLactobacillusPeptideFood scienceChemistrySubstrate (aquarium)ChromatographyBiochemistryBiologyFermentation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Egg white was hydrolyzed by Alcalase to prepare egg white peptide in this study. The optimal hydrolysis parameters were determined by Box-Behnken experimental design as 4.5 g/100 mL substrate concentration, pH 9.0, 64 ℃ and 5.0% [E]/[S] ratio, yielding a degree of hydrolysis as high as 21.89% in 3 h of hydrolysis. Egg white peptide could obviously promote the growth of Lactobacillus bulgaricus. The best growth-promoting effect was achieved by addition of 3.0% by volume of egg white hydrolyzed for 3 h(mostly peptides with a molecular weight of 1 513 u), increasing the number of viable cells by 1(lg(CFU/mL)) when compared with the blank control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood ScienceSame topicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive PeptidesFrench-language works237,207