Analysis on the Characteristics of Cognitive Impairment of Different Parts of the Stroke Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To explore the characteristics of cognitive impairment of the patients with different parts of ischemic stroke in acute phase.Methods: 230 cases of acute cerebral infarction(1-14 days) patients were collected,including 31 cases of frontal lobe,27 cases of temporal lobe,26 cases of parietal lobe,21 cases of occipital lobe,47 cases of basal ganglia,35 cases of thalamus,23 cases of the cerebellum and 20 cases of brain stem.The cognitive function for all subjects were evaluated by using the Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale.Results:(1) The incidence of cognitive impairment for different position of ischemic stroke was significantly different(p0.05),which was highest in frontal group(90%) and lowest in cerebellum group and brain stem group,temporal lobe group took second place(80%).(2)The scores of frontal group in visuospatial and executive function and attention aspects were lower than those of other groups(P0.05),naming and delayed recall aspects in temporal lobe group had a lower score as compared with other groups;the MOCA scores in parietal and occipital groups were lower than that in the basal ganglia,cerebellums and brainstem groups(P0.05);the scores of thalamus group was not only lower than that of parietal lobe,occipital lobe,basal ganglia,cerebellum and brainstem groups in visuospatial and executive function and attention aspects,but also had a lower score in language and Orientation cognitive domain aspects as compared with any other groups(P0.05).Conclusions: The incidence and characteristics of cognitive impairment was different for different parts of the cerebral infarction patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".