Bibliographic record
Abstract
The expression of AQP1, 2 in kidney of filial Meriones meridianus was investigated by immunohistochemistry combined with stereological method,and the expression intensity of AQP1,2 was analyzed by IPP professional image analysis software. Results showed that there was expression of AQP1,2 in kidney of filial M. meridianus at postnatal day 1,7,14,21,and 32. AQP1 immunopositive cells mainly distributed in the epithelial cells of proximal convoluted tubule and thin segment of medullary loop in kidney at postnatal day 1,7,14,21,and 32,while AQP2 expressed on the apical plasma membrane of collecting duct principal cells at postnatal day 1,7,14,21,and 32. Surface area density and average optical density of AQP1 positive cells in proximal convoluted tubule and thin segment of medullary loop and AQP2 positive cells in collecting duct in kidney of filial M. meridianus increased( P 0. 05 or P 0. 01) at postnatal 7 day,but there was no significant difference from postnatal day 7 to postnatal day 32( P 0. 05). The results showed that the expression level of AQP1,2 positive cells in kidney of filial M. meridianus increased at postnatal day 7,when the ability of water reabsorption of proximal convoluted tubule,thin segment of medullary loop and collecting duct increased. AQP1,2 might play an important role in urine concentrating of filial M. meridianus kidney to regulate the balance of water in kidney.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".